A personal finance blog about trading, investing, and other wealth building strategies. Learn how to trade options, get trade ideas, and make money online from home.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
ES channel breakout
Looks like that reverse head and shoulders worked for a trade today. I sold a 114/116 SPY call spread at the resistance line (1095) that didn't hold up. I will look to sell another if we near the upper resistance line at roughly 1150.
I didn't put on any positions, just practicing charting and following in the after hours. If this was the regular market session and this pattern formed I would probably buy a straddle and see if we got a breakout in either direction.
Legacy position close out
I have one more of these legacy positions that I want to work my way out of. I don't have the patience to wait 8 months for time decay. I'm also wanting to clear the books and kind of start from scratch a few months from now once I'm done with the mentoring program and formulate/implement my portfolio strategy going forward. I want to start with a fresh round number and no old positions so that will make record keeping easier.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
ES trade
Friday, May 21, 2010
May 2010 OPEX Results
April 2010 OPEX Results
Thursday, May 20, 2010
HV Mesa/Plateau
You can do a few things to try and get a better sense of the real HV disregarding the one day move. You can either take out that move with simple math, as in the picture below maybe you say that HV was running at about 60% and then after the one day big move it was steady again, so it's true HV disregarding an outlying event is still roughly 60%. Another thing you can do is play with shorter or long time period HVs which will either take out the recent event or smooth it out over time if using a longer-term time frame. Anyway, just wanted to share as obviously looking at this chart you would assume that with a 400% current HV that the stock is moving wildly every day, when in fact it's had two big moves and then relatively small intraday movement other than those two big moves.
7% of S&P 500 Stocks Above 50-Day Moving Averages
Sent to you by Dominic via Google Reader:
One day in early April, 93% of stocks in the S&P 500 were trading above their 50-day moving averages while 7% were below their 50-days. Now the exact opposite is true -- 7% are above their 50-days, while 93% are below. And just like the reading rarely stays above the 90% level for long, it also rarely stays below the 10% level. As shown in the chart below, the indicator is currently at its lowest level since March 2009 when it hit 5%. During the depths of the collapse in late 2008, the reading got down to zero percent. At this point, investors have to decide whether or not they think things could get as bad as they did in late 2008.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Think BIG using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Managing Risk
Sent to you by Dominic via Google Reader:
Over the years I've been fortunate enough to get to know thousands of market participants. Some are long-term investors others are scalping pennies per trade on thousands of shares while others manage millions of other people's money. The interesting theme I picked up on with nearly every one of them is that they each experienced panic and uncertainty at certain times in the market. Oftentimes, this panic stems from the inability to make sense of the market, to gain control of market participation. Thoughts such as whether or not too much capital is at work or perhaps not enough or even whether or not to be in the market at all seemed to consume them.
This ambivalence can consume and debilitate even the best market participants. The uncertainty or self-doubt about market participation is common yet finding a solution is not. The greater the level of uncertainty felt the higher the odds are that risk is being misperceived. Here are some questions that I've asked to assess whether risk was real or perceived:
- What are your reactions, both physical and emotional, to a losing trade? A winning trade?
- Have you rationalized recent losses?
- Has your out-of-market homework/research fallen behind?
- Do you monitor your positions by dollars or percentages?
- Have you ever not taken a trade that made sense simply because you were burned before?
- Has the number of indicators you use to enter/manage/exit a position increased/decreased lately?
- Do you know the Beta of your portfolio?
- What would others say about you when asked about your risk management?
In a sense, managing risk involves managing the emotional side of trading so that the focus can be on the cognitive side of trading. As an example, if I'm concerned with the direction of the market because my traditional analysis methods are giving unclear signals then it probably doesn't make much sense for me to participate. My biases will impact the data, whether it's of a technical or fundamental nature, and lead to poor decisions. If I'm unable to clearly define what sectors are leading and which are lagging and, more importantly, why they are moving in the direction they are, then my risk is skewed. It's times like these that large losses can accrue as objectivity is clouded by subjectivity.
I've always used sleep as a gauge to help me know if I'm in-line with real risk. If I'm able to sleep at night and wake up excited to participate in the market then I know that the odds are good I'm managing my risk. If I'm unable to get a good night's sleep and lay awake wondering about positions I have on the odds are good that my risk management is off. Yea, I'm pretty simple.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Attitrade-Proactive Trading using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Interesting links
I think that the first link is a very interesting strategy and something I would like to consider. To me this would had been a nice addition to the trade in ITMN. If I recall correctly the trade was long covered calls. So I think going out and buying really cheap puts or calls could had served well. I actually went back into the think or swim platform and looked at buying the $15 covered call which on 3/4 was going for 10.41 and buying the $35 calls that were going for 0.15 at the time. The stock was trading at 14.61. By 3/10 those way OTM calls that you purchased for 0.15 were worth 3.90 with the stock trading at 38.90. On this simulation I did a 100 covered call position and used about half of the premium collected to buy 10 calls. These calls that cost $150 now added $3,760.
I know I used the calls only because I remember what direction the stock finished and it was the easiest to illustrate. But I can see the power of the OTM "units" for buying puts on the downside as well. Or on stocks like ITMN maybe using all the premium collected to by OTM options on both sides. Anyways it got me thinking and I thought I would share.
how-option-time-premium-decays-over-the-weekend
Just thought this was interesting.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
USO/IWO trade
Buy/Sell | Qty | Ticker | Month | Strike | Call/Put | Price | Under. |
Sell | 5 | USO | June | 32/30 | Put Spread | .50 | $33.50 |
After initiating this trade I decided to look at another angle. If my threshold for pain on the short put spread is roughly $170, I wanted to see what kind of comparative risk/return there would be had I just used the $170 to buy calls instead. Below is the analytics on this scenario, it assumes that if we have a bounce in the underlying that IV comes down to a more recent range of about 35%. At this new lower IV range and taking off a few days, even at a price of $36 the return is only about $173. And this would still leave you with another three weeks of theta risk. So assuming you are playing for the underlying to stop falling and/or bet a bounce, I would still favor selling puts here as opposed to buying calls. This analysis however should have been done before the trade and not after.
Update: On 5/25 I closed this trade out for a loss. I might have jumped the gun a little in that my original exit point was on a close under $31.50 and we haven't yet closed below that level. However, intraday we've traded below $31.00 and also a new 52 week low (see chart below). In the 7 days since this trade was initiated the global macro news has only gotten worse. As of today my gut feel was wrong, another technical level was broken, and I wouldn't put this trade on today. So I'm comfortable closing it out today for a $225 loss rather than possibly take the maximum $750 loss three and half weeks from now.
Profit/Loss: I sold this spread for a .50 debit and closed it out for .95, net loss of (.45 x 5 contracts) = $225 plus commissions.
Monday, May 17, 2010
I think there is more downside!
As you can see from above I am selling 5 put spreads @ 1.42. I am setting my stop to the 116-116.50 (grey area on chart below) . As this would represent a gap fill from last Thursdays gap down and would also have SPY retake the 20 period moving average on the 20 day 1 hour chart below.
I am risking about $163 if I were stopped out at 116.50 and maybe a little less as a move up to this point may bring volatility down. The max gain at $110 is $1290.
I sold the $110 as this is the area of the 200 day moving average witch I think could be the next target for the SPY ETF to head.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
GOOG naked call close out
I was short 15 May GOOG $600 calls with entry points of .97 on 4/26 for the first 5 and .35 on 4/5 for the last 10 contracts. I closed them out today for .05. There is close to 0% chance this would have lost money with the stock at $505 and 8 trading days left. But for .05 it isn't worth the risk, and more importantly, it was tying up about $100,000 in margin for some reason. I tried to figure out the maintenance margin requirement on IBs site but wasn't able to find it. The calculations for a portfolio margin account are not stated clearly in words nor are there any mathematical calculations. I would rather have the 100K margin available for another opportunity then tie it up for another possible 15 x .05 = $75.
BAC naked put close out
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
BRK-B update
BRK-B Exit
An experiment in GE
1) The puts I sold expire worthless and I can do it again month after month.
2) The puts expire in the money in which case I take delivery of the stock and start to write covered calls against the stock, which now gets me the same risk profile as a call spread (with a put, stock , an sold call).
3) The puts expire in the money and I could immediately turn around and exercise my right to sell with the purchased put. To me this is the least desirable alternative unless the stock has moved so much against me that it just makes sense to cut the trade with a maximum defined risk.
I am leaning towards trying to play it with scenario 1 and 2 in mind. But am open to the fact that the stock could potentially take a dump making it unappealing to continue forward with the strategy.
So lets take a closer look at what I am going to do:
So I am going to purchase the $17.50 put with Jan 2012 expiration which will give me plenty of time to see how this strategy plays out. This particular put is trading for 3.65. I am going to sell the front month May '10 $17 put which is currently trading for $0.18. This will put my overall cost basis at 3.47 for this diagonal.
I have chosen GE as the experiment stock as it is a name that I know and I think that it is less prone to huge moves which I think would not work well for this strategy. My thesis going into this trade is that this would work for more of a slow mover and not a momentum stock. But only time will tell.
I will post updates to the trade to the comments section of this post going forward.
Leg 1 = Buy 1 $17.50 Jan '12 put @ 3.65
Leg 2 = Sell 1 $17 May '10 put @ 0.18
Monday, May 10, 2010
New positions from Friday closed for 50% gains
To me this sale was just a no brainier and I did not fill compelled to do any fancy chart work and analysis. I knew the bet I wanted to make and just had to find the names I wanted to make it in. It obviously could had gone the other way and still can but I was able to exploit a volatility spike as I set out to do.
All in all it was only a gain of about $170.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Diagonal vs. Covered Call
Sentiment Indicators
Thursday, May 6, 2010
New short in ES
BOFI long 100 shares
Anyways as the market is pulling back I this stock has pulled back from its all time high made in the latest run higher of 19.27 down to about 15.60. When I first identified the stock I thought the stock was overbought and wanted to wait for a pull back to a more attractive level. The 50 day moving average was about $15 and I saw sum good support around $14, so I set my alert around this area and a week later it is know at what I consider an attractive price which offers great risk/reward.
I am buying a bit in front of the 50 day moving average as one thing I have learned over the last few months and especially more recently is that this entry and exit thing is more of an art than a science. I bought 100 shares @ 15.98. One thing to take notice on the chart is the increased volume that this stock has been attracting since last September. I do not normally look at stocks with volume under 1MM shares a day because of liquidity concerns, but I like the prospects of the growing volume and will look for this to continue. I bought stock as this equity does not trade options. I am placing my stop between 12-14 dollars. So the hard stop would be a breach of 12, and I will use discretion to either add a little if it trades between 12-14 or make the decision to exit. This will either give me a little more flexibility to let the position work or I am just opening up my risk for a larger loss. After being stopped out of so many positions the last few months I feel like I need a little more room to breath because I have watched many of the positions that get stopped out move just beyond my stop only to then reverse and move in the direction of my initial trade.
With the increased volume and nice uptrend I think this one can continue to make new highs after a bit of a rest and have an initial target of $20 and then higher. That initially puts my risk at 1:1, which for right now I am comfortable with as I think it will go higher than this.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Monthly Goals for May
- Start mentoring with Dan Passarelli (started out slow but week 5 was a great learning week, lots to build on from here)
- Spend some time getting familiar with TOS analytics platform (definitely feel more comfortable but I've only scratched the surface of its power)
- Finish book on the Greeks, start new books on technical analysis (read Trading With The Greeks twice)
- Create trader filter worksheet (really happy with my progress here, I have a working template in place that I'm comfortable with)
- Try to get options trading group together in person and online (we had an in person meeting but there I would deem it a failure, only half the people showed up and there didn't seem to be a cohesive interest going forward, but we might have added one contributor to the blog this week)
- Work on updating trade tracker with past trades from last 18 months (didn't make a whole lot of process here, it's a very time consuming task)
Generated feed for "http://www.optionszone.com/"
Sent to you by Dominic via Google Reader:
- If I'm Making Money, Nothing Else Matters, Right? Wrong! Just because you are making money now, does not mean you are going to succeed. Learn more.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to http://www.optionszone.com/ Google feed using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites